Rudimentary stages of the mathematical thinking and proficiency

Mathematical skills of low-performing pupils at the beginning of the first grade

Authors

  • Jari Metsämuuronen Finnish National Education Evaluation Centre (FINEEC) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6027-0799
  • Annette Ukkola Finnish National Education Evaluation Centre (FINEEC)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.10.2.1632

Keywords:

mathematical thinking, mathematically low-achieving students, national assessment in mathematics, pre-primary education, primary education

Abstract

A national-level dataset (n = 7770) at grade 1 of primary school is re-analyzed to study preconditions in proficiency in mathematical concepts, operations and mathematical abstractions and thinking. The focus is on those pupils whose preconditions are so low that they are below the first measurable level of proficiency in the common framework with reference to mathematics (CFM). At the beginning of school, these pupils may not be familiar with, e.g., the concepts of numbers 1–10, they may not be aware of the consecutive nature of numbers, and they have no or very limited understanding of the basic concepts of length, mass, volume, and time.  A somewhat surprising finding is that the key factor explaining the absolute low proficiency in mathematics appeared to be a low proficiency in listening comprehension. This variable alone explains 41% of the probability of belonging to the group of pupils who are not able to show proficiency enough to reach the lowest level in any of the criteria. It is understandable that, if language skills are underdeveloped in general, a child is not expected to master the specific mathematical vocabulary either and, hence, the low score in a test of preconceptions in mathematics too. Other variables predicting the absolute low level or preconditions of mathematics are the decision on intensified or special support, status of Finnish or Swedish as second language, and negative attitudes toward mathematics.

References

Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Nurmi, J.-E. (2006). Developmental dynamics between mathematical performance, task motivation, and teachers' goals during the transition to primary school. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X51608

Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606

Baye, A., & Monseur, C. (2016). Gender differences in variability and extreme scores in an international context. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 4(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186%2Fs40536-015-0015-x

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Dhuey, E., Figlio, D., Karbownik, K., & Roth, J. (2019). School starting age and cognitive development. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 38(3), 538–578. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22135

Dilnot, J., Hamilton, L., Maughan, B., & Snowling, M. J. (2016). Child and environmental risk factors predicting readiness for learning in children at high risk of dyslexia. Development and Psychopathology, 29(1), 235–244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579416000134

EDUFI (2003). National core curriculum for upper secondary schools 2003. Finnish National Agency for Education. [In Finnish]

EDUFI (2004). National core curriculum for basic education 2004. Finnish National Agency for Education. [In Finnish]

EDUFI (2014). National core curriculum 2014. Määräykset ja ohjeet 2014:96. Finnish National Agency for Education. [In Finnish]

EDUFI (2015). National core curriculum for upper secondary Schools 2015. Määräykset ja ohjeet 2015:48. Finnish National Agency for Education. [In Finnish]

EDUFI (2016). National core curriculum for preprimary education 2014. Määräykset ja ohjeet 2016:1. Finnish National Agency for Education. [In Finnish]

Eklund, K. (2017). School-aged reading skills of children with family history of dyslexia: predictors, development and outcome. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research 574. University of Jyväskylä.

Erola, J., Jalonen, S., & Lehti, H. (2016). Parental education, class and income over early life course and children’s achievement. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 44, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2016.01.003

Funa consortium (2019). FUNA - An online test battery for functional numeracy assessment. http://oppimisanalytiikka.fi/funa

Johnson, W., Carothers, A., & Deary, I. J. (2008). Sex differences in variability in general intelligence: A new look at the old question. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 518-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00096.x

Kass, G. (1980). An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Applied Statistics, 29(2), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/2986296

Kivinen, A. (2018). The effect of relative school starting age on having an individualized curriculum in Finland. VATT Working Papers 104. Valtion taloudellinen tutkimuskeskus. https://www.doria.fi/handle/10024/149387

Kivinen, O., Hedman, J., & Kaipainen, P. (2012). Koulutusmahdollisuuksien yhdenvertaisuus Suomessa. [Equality of the educational opportunities in Finland.] Yhteiskuntapolitiikka, 77(5), 559–566. https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/103027/kivinen.pdf

Kuukka, K., & Metsämuuronen, J. (2016). Perusopetuksen päättövaiheen suomi toisena kielenä (L2) -oppimäärän oppimistulosten arviointi 2015. [Assessment of the learning outcomes of the L2 Finnish 2015.] Publications 2016:13. Finnish Education Evaluation Centre (FINEEC). http://karvi.fi/app/uploads/2016/05/KARVI_1316.pdf

Lerkkanen, M.-K., Poikkeus, A.-M., Ahonen, T., Siekkinen, M., Niemi, P., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2010). Luku- ja kirjoitustaidon kehitys sekä motivaatio esi- ja alkuopetusvuosina. [Development of reading- and writing skills, and motivation during preprimary and primary education] Kasvatus, 41(2), 116–128. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285029301_Luku-_ja_kirjoitustaidon_seka_motivaation_kehitys_esi-_ja_alkuopetusvuosina

Lerkkanen, M.-K., Kiuru, N., Pakarinen, E., Viljaranta, J., Poikkeus, A.-M., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Siekkinen, M., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2012). The role of teaching practices in the development of children’s interest in reading and mathematics in kindergarten. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(4), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.03.004

Machin, S., & Pekkarinen, T. (2008). Global sex differences in test score variability. Science, 322(5906), 1331–1332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1162573

Malanchini, M., Rimfeld, K., Wang, Z., Petrill, S. A., Tucker-Drob, E. M., Plomin, R., & Kovas, Y. (2020). Genetic factors underlie the association between anxiety, attitudes and performance in mathematics. Translational Psychiatry, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-0711-3

Metsämuuronen, J. (2009). Metodit arvioinnin apuna. [Methods assisting the assessment.] Oppimistulosten arviointi 1/2009. Finnish National Agency for Education. [In Finnish].

Metsämuuronen, J. (2010). Osaamisen ja asenteiden muuttuminen perusopetuksen ensimmäisten vuosien aikana. [Development of achievement and attitudes during the first years in basic education] In E. K. Niemi & J. Metsämuuronen (Eds.), Miten matematiikan taidot kehittyvät? Matematiikan oppimistulokset peruskoulun viidennen vuosiluokan jälkeen vuonna 2008. [How are the learning outcomes developing? Learning outcomes in mathematics after the grade 5 in basic education in year 2008?] Koulutuksen seurantaraportit 2010:2. Finnish National Agency for Education. https://karvi.fi/app/uploads/2014/09/OPH_0410.pdf [In Finnish]

Metsämuuronen J (2013a). Matemaattisen osaamisen muutos perusopetuksen luokilla 3-9. [Change in the mathematical achievement in grades 3–9 in the compulsory education] In J. Metsämuuronen (Ed.), Perusopetuksen matematiikan oppimistulosten pitkittäisarviointi vuosina 2005–2012. [Longitudinal assessment of learning outcomes in mathematics during years 2005–2012] Koulutuksen seurantaraportit 2013:4. Finnish National Agency for Education. http://karvi.fi/app/uploads/2014/09/OPH-0113.pdf [In Finnish]

Metsämuuronen, J. (2013b). A new method to setting standard for the wide range of language proficiency levels. International Education Research, 1(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266908493_A_New_Method_to_Setting_Standard_for_the_Wide_Range_of_Language_Proficiency_Levels

Metsämuuronen, J. (2017a). Oppia ikä kaikki. Matemaattinen osaaminen toisen asteen koulutuksen lopussa 2015. [Learning all my days. Mathematical achievement at the end of secondary education 2015.] Publications 1:2017. Finnish Education Evaluation Centre (FINEEC). https://karvi.fi/app/uploads/2017/03/KARVI_0117.pdf [In Finnish]

Metsämuuronen, J. (2017b). Essentials of research methods in human sciences. Vol 2: Multivariate analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Metsämuuronen, J. (2017c). Essentials of research methods in human sciences. Vol 3: Advanced analysis. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Metsämuuronen J (2018). Common framework for mathematics. Discussions of possibilities to develop a set of general standards for assessing proficiency in mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2), 13–39. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2693

Metsämuuronen, J. (2020). Somers’ D as an alternative for the item–test and item–rest correlation coefficients in the educational measurement settings. International Journal of Educational Measurement, 6(1), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.1.207

Metsämuuronen, J. (2021). Directional nature of Goodman–Kruskal gamma and some consequences. Identity of Goodman–Kruskal gamma and Somers delta, and their connection to Jonckheere–Terpstra test statistic. Behaviormetrika, 48(2), 283–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41237-021-00138-8

Metsämuuronen, J. (2022a). Deflation-corrected estimators of reliability. Frontiers in Psychology, 12:748672. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748672

Metsämuuronen, J. (2022b). Effect of various simultaneous sources of mechanical error in the estimators of correlation causing deflation in reliability. Seeking the best options of correlation for deflation-corrected reliability. Behaviormetrika, 49(1), 91–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41237-022-00158-y

Metsämuuronen, J. & Tuohilampi, L. (2014). Changes in Achievement in and Attitude toward Mathematics of the Finnish Children from Grade 0 to 9. A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 4(2), 145–169. http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jedp/article/view/36185

Metsämuuronen, J. & Ukkola, A. (2019). Alkumittauksen menetelmällisiä ratkaisuja. [Methodological solutions in baseline measurement.] Publications 18:2019. Finnish Education Evaluation Centre (FINEEC). https://karvi.fi/app/uploads/2019/08/KARVI_1819.pdf [In Finnish]

Nagelkerke, N. J. D. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78(3), 691–692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/78.3.691

Niemi, L., Metsämuuronen, J., Hannula, M., & Laine, A. (2020). Matematiikan parhaaksi osaajaksi kehittyminen perusopetuksen aikana. [To develop to the best achiever in mathematics during the basic education.] Ainedidaktiikka, 4(1), 2–33. https://doi.org/10.23988/ad.83384

Niemi, L., Metsämuuronen, J., Hannula, M., & Laine, A. (2021). Matematiikan parhaat osaajat toisen asteen lopussa ja heidän matematiikka-asenteissaan tapahtuneet muutokset. [The best achievers in mathematics at the end of secondary education and changes in attitudes toward mathematics] LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 9(1), 457–494. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.1.1511

O'Dea, R. E., Lagisz, M., Jennions, M. D., & Nakagawa, S. (2018). Gender differences in individual variation in academic grades fail to fit expected patterns for STEM. Nature communications, 9(1), 3777. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06292-0

OECD. (2015). Education at a Glance 2015: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/education/education-at-a-glance-2015.htm

OECD. (2016). Technical Report of the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). Second Edition. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/PIAAC_Technical_Report_2nd_Edition_Full_Report.pdf

Paju, P. (2020). Best childhood money can buy. Child poverty, inequality and living with scarcity, the Finnish case. Lastensuojelun Keskusliitto.

Palomäki, S., Laherto, L., Kukkonen, T., Hakonen, H., & Tammelin, T. (2016). Vanhempien hyvä koulutus- ja tulotaso on yhteydessä nuorten liikkumiseen etenkin urheiluseuroissa. [Parents’ high level of education and salary are connected to the sports activity of adolecents specifically through sports clubs.] Liikunta & Tiede, 53(4), 92–98. https://www.lts.fi/media/lts_vertaisarvioidut_tutkimusartikkelit/2016/lt416_tutkimusartikkelit_pa-lomaki_lowres_nimeton-liite-00004.pdf

PISA (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What students know and can do. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Räsänen, P., Aunio, P., Laine, A., Hakkarainen, A., Väisänen, E., Finell, J., Rajala, T., Laakso, M.-J., & Korhonen, J. (2021). Effects of gender on basic numerical and arithmetic skills: Pilot data from 3rd to 9th grade for a large-scale online dyscalculia screener. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.683672

Šidák, Z. (1967). Rectangular confidence region for the means of multivariate normal distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(318), 626–633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1967.10482935

Sirniö, O. (2016). Constrained life chances: Intergenerational transmission of income in Finland. Publications of the Faculty of Social Sciences 29. Sociology. University of Helsinki. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-51-1098-5

TIMSS (2020). Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 International results in mathematics and science. https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timsL2019/international-results/wp-content/themes/timssandpirls/download-center/TIMSS-2019-International-Results-in-Mathematics-and-Science.pdf

Tuohilampi, L. & Hannula, M. S. (2013). Matematiikkaan liittyvien asenteiden kehitys sekä asenteiden ja osaamisen välinen vuorovaikutus 3., 6. ja 9. luokalla. [Changes of attitudes related to matematics and their interaction at grades 3, 6, and 9.] In J. Metsämuuronen (Ed.), Perusopetuksen matematiikan oppimistulosten pitkittäisarviointi vuosina 2005–2012 [Longitudinal assessment of learning outcomes in mathematics during years 2005–2012.] (pp. 231–252). Koulutuksen seurantaraportit 2013:4. Finnish National Agency for Education. http://karvi.fi/app/uploads/2014/09/OPH-0113.pdf [In Finnish]

Ukkola, A. & Metsämuuronen, J. (2019). Alkumittaus – Matematiikan ja äidinkielen ja kirjallisuuden osaaminen ensimmäisen luokan alussa. [Zero-level measurement. Proficiency of mathematics and mother language and literature at the beginning of grade 1.] Publications 17:2019. Finnish Education Evaluation Centre (FINEEC). https://karvi.fi/app/uploads/2019/07/KARVI_1719.pdf [In Finnish]

Ukkola, A. & Metsämuuronen, J. (2021). Matematiikan ja äidinkielen ja kirjallisuuden osaaminen kolmannen luokan alussa. [Achievement in mathematics and mother language and literature at grade 3.] Publications 20:2021. Finnish Education Evaluation Centre (FINEEC). https://karvi.fi/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/KARVI_2021.pdf

Ukkola, A., Metsämuuronen, J. & Paananen, M. (2020). Alkumittauksen syventäviä kysymyksiä. [Deepening questions of zero-level measurement] Publications 10:2020. Finnish Education Evaluation Centre (FINEEC). https://karvi.fi/app/uploads/2020/08/KARVI_Alkumittaus.pdf [In Finnish]

Van der Schoot, F. (2009). Cito variation of the Bookmark method. Reference supplement, Section I. In S. Takala (Ed.), Relating language examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (CEFR). A Manual. Language Policy Division, Strasbourg. https://rm.coe.int/1680667a24

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Metsämuuronen, J., & Ukkola, A. (2022). Rudimentary stages of the mathematical thinking and proficiency: Mathematical skills of low-performing pupils at the beginning of the first grade. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 56–83. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.10.2.1632