Students’ perceptions of self-assessment and their approaches to learning in university mathematics


  • Riikka Kangaslampi Unit of Computing Sciences, Tampere University, Finland
  • Henna Asikainen HYPE Centre for University Teaching and Learning, University of Helsinki, Finland
  • Viivi Virtanen HAMK Edu Research Unit, Häme University of Applied Sciences, Finland



mathematics, self-assessment, approaches to learning, grading


This study aims at better understanding of the use of self-assessment to support high-achieving students in first-year university mathematics. The students, who had not previously self-assessed their skills and knowledge in mathematics, were given two self-assessment exercises during a calculus course: they assessed their prior knowledge and learning goals in the beginning of the course and the quality of their learning outcomes in the end. Their approaches to learning and perceptions of self-assessment were studied with questionnaires in the beginning and at the end of the course. The students felt that they were able to assess their performance and that self-assessment exercises helped them to learn. Their self-ratings agreed well with the teacher's grading. Self-assessment was implemented to support novice students to adopt a deep approach to learning, and the results showing a statistically significant decrease in unreflective approach give an encouraging signal.


Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria‐referenced self‐assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159–181.

Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting Learning and Achievement Through Self-Assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 12–19.

Asikainen, H., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Do Students Develop Towards More Deep Approaches to Learning During Studies? A Systematic Review on the Development of Students’ Deep and Surface Approaches to Learning in Higher Education. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 205–234.

Asikainen, H., Virtanen, V., Postareff, L., & Heino, P. (2014). The validity and students’ experiences of peer assessment in a large introductory class of gene technology. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 197–205.

Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (2nd ed). Society for Research into Higher Education : Open University Press.

Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151–167.

Boud, D., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Bennett, S., Joughin, G., & Molloy, E. (2018). Reframing assessment research: Through a practice perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 43(7), 1107–1118.

Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (2013). Does student engagement in self-assessment calibrate their judgement over time? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 941–956.

Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (2015). The calibration of student judgement through self-assessment: Disruptive effects of assessment patterns. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 45–59.

Brown, G. T. L., Gebril, A., & Michaelides, M. P. (2019). Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment: A Global Phenomenon or a Global Localism. Frontiers in Education, 4, 16.

Capan Melser, M., Lettner, S., Bäwert, A., Puttinger, C., & Holzinger, A. (2020). Pursue today and assess tomorrow—How students’ subjective perceptions influence their preference for self- and peer assessments. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 479.

Crisp, G. T. (2012). Integrative assessment: Reframing assessment practice for current and future learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(1), 33–43.

Ćukušić, M., Garača, Ž., & Jadrić, M. (2014). Online self-assessment and students’ success in higher education institutions. Computers & Education, 72, 100–109.

Diplomi-insinööri- ja arkkitehtikoulutuksen yhteisvalinta: Aikataulut ja tulokset. (2020). DIA.

Diseth, Å., & Martinsen, Ø. (2003). Approaches to Learning, Cognitive Style, and Motives as Predictors of Academic Achievement. Educational Psychology, 23(2), 195–207.

Entwistle, N. J. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Palgrave Macmillan.

Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. Croom Helm [u.a.].

Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student Self-Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395–430.

Fernández-Ruiz, J., & Panadero, E. (2020). Comparison between conceptions and assessment practices among secondary education teachers: More differences than similarities (Comparación entre concepciones y prácticas de evaluación en profesores de Educación Secundaria: más diferencias que semejanzas). Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 43(2), 309–346.

González-Betancor, S. M., Bolívar-Cruz, A., & Verano-Tacoronte, D. (2019). Self-assessment accuracy in higher education: The influence of gender and performance of university students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 101–114.

Halinen, K., Ruohoniemi, M., Katajavuori, N., & Virtanen, V. (2014). Life science teachers’ discourse on assessment: A valuable insight into the variable conceptions of assessment in higher education. Journal of Biological Education, 48(1), 16–22.

Hosein, A., & Harle, J. (2018). The relationship between students’ prior mathematical attainment, knowledge and confidence on their self-assessment accuracy. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 56, 32–41.

Iannone, P., & Simpson, A. (2015). Students’ preferences in undergraduate mathematics assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 40(6), 1046–1067.

Ibabe, I., & Jauregizar, J. (2010). Online self-assessment with feedback and metacognitive knowledge. Higher Education, 59(2), 243–258.

Kearney, S., Perkins, T., & Kennedy-Clark, S. (2016). Using self- and peer-assessments for summative purposes: Analysing the relative validity of the AASL (Authentic Assessment for Sustainable Learning) model. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(6), 840–853.

Kissling, E. M., & O’Donnell, M. E. (2015). Increasing language awareness and self-efficacy of FL students using self-assessment and the ACTFL proficiency guidelines. Language Awareness, 24(4), 283–302.

Kun, A. I. (2016). A comparison of self versus tutor assessment among Hungarian undergraduate business students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 350–367.

Kyndt, E., Dochy, F., Struyven, K., & Cascallar, E. (2011). The direct and indirect effect of motivation for learning on students’ approaches to learning through the perceptions of workload and task complexity. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(2), 135–150.

Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Parpala, A., & Postareff, L. (2019). What constitutes the surface approach to learning in the light of new empirical evidence? Studies in Higher Education, 44(12), 2183–2195.

Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.

Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning II: Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(2), 115–127.

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution.

McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student Self-Assessment: The Key to Stronger Student Motivation and Higher Achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40–49.

Minbashian, A., Huon, G. F., & Bird, K. D. (2004). Approaches to studying and academic performance in short-essay exams. Higher Education, 47(2), 161–176.

Mok, M. M. C., Lung, C. L., Cheng, D. P. W., Cheung, R. H. P., & Ng, M. L. (2006). Self‐assessment in higher education: Experience in using a metacognitive approach in five case studies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 415–433.

Ndoye, A. (2017). Peer/self-assessment and student learning. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(2), 255–269.

Nieminen, J. H., Asikainen, H., & Rämö, J. (2021). Promoting deep approach to learning and self-efficacy by changing the purpose of self-assessment: A comparison of summative and formative models. Studies in Higher Education, 46(7), 1296–1311.

Nieminen, J. H., & Tuohilampi, L. (2020). ‘Finally studying for myself’ – examining student agency in summative and formative self-assessment models. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(7), 1031–1045.

Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2016). The impact of paper-based, computer-based and mobile-based self-assessment on students’ science motivation and achievement. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1241–1248.

Öhrstedt, M., & Lindfors, P. (2019). First-semester students’ capacity to predict academic achievement as related to approaches to learning. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(10), 1420–1432.

Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2016). The Future of Student Self-Assessment: A Review of Known Unknowns and Potential Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803–830.

Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144.

Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 133–148.

Parpala, A., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2012). Using a research instrument for developing quality at the university. Quality in Higher Education, 18(3), 313–328.

Parpala, Anna., Lindblom-Ylänne, Sari., Komulainen, Erkki., Litmanen, Topi., & Hirsto, Laura. (2010). Students’ approaches to learning and their experiences of the teaching-learning environment in different disciplines. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 269–282.

Pereira, D., Niklasson, L., & Flores, M. A. (2017). Students’ perceptions of assessment: A comparative analysis between Portugal and Sweden. Higher Education, 73(1), 153–173.

Postareff, L., Virtanen, V., Katajavuori, N., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2012). Academics’ conceptions of assessment and their assessment practices. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(3–4), 84–92.

Rust, C., O’Donovan, B., & Price, M. (2005). A social constructivist assessment process model: How the research literature shows us this could be best practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(3), 231–240.

Siow, L.-F. (2015). Students’ perceptions on self- and peer-assessment in enhancing learning experience. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 21–35.

Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review1. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 325–341.

Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Relating approaches to study and quality of learning outcomes at the course level. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61(3), 265–275.

Tuohilampi, L., Nieminen, J. H., Häsä, J., & Rämö, J. (2018). The interplay of informative assessment criteria and continuous feedback with mathematics students’ learning orientations. In Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. PME International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

Warwick, J., & Howard, A. (2015). Student Self-Assessment of Mathematical Skills: A Pilot Study of Accounting Student. E-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship of Teaching, 9, 1–12.

Willey, K., & Gardner, A. (2010). Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment activities to engage students and promote learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 429–443.

Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017). A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1247–1262.

Yucel, R., Bird, F. L., Young, J., & Blanksby, T. (2014). The road to self-assessment: Exemplar marking before peer review develops first-year students’ capacity to judge the quality of a scientific report. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(8), 971–986.




How to Cite

Kangaslampi, R., Asikainen, H., & Virtanen, V. (2022). Students’ perceptions of self-assessment and their approaches to learning in university mathematics. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 10(1), 1–22.