“Learning models”

Utilising young students’ algebraic thinking about equations





The El’konin-Davydov curriculum,, learning activity,, learning models,, visualised algebraic thinking


The overarching aim of this article is to exemplify and analyse how some algebraic aspects of equations can be theoretically explored and reflected upon by young students in collaboration with their teacher. The article is based upon an empirical example from a case study in a grade 1 in a primary school. The chosen lesson is framed by the El’konin-Davydov curriculum (ED Curriculum) and learning activity theory in which the concept of a learning model is crucial. Of the 23 participating students, 12 were girls and 11 boys, approximately seven to eight years old. The analysis of data focuses on the use of learning models and reflective elaboration and discussions exploring algebraic structures of whole and parts. The findings indicate that it is possible to promote the youngest students’ algebraic understanding of equations through the collective and reflective use of learning models, and we conclude that the students had opportunity to develop algebraic thinking about equations as a result of their participation in the learning activity.


Cai, J., & Knuth, E. (2011). Introduction. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. VII–XI). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4

Carraher, D., & Schliemann, A. D. (2014). Early algebra teaching and learning. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 193–196). Springer.

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. In A. Kozulin, B., Gindis, V. S., Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context. Learning in doing (pp. 39–64). Cambridge University Press.

Davydov, V. V. (1962). An experiment in introducing elements of algebra in elementary school. Soviet Education, 5(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.2753/RES1060-9393050127

Davydov, V. V. (2008). Problems of developmental instruction. A theoretical and experimental psychological study. Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Davydov, V. V., Slobodchikov, V. I., & Tsuckerman, G. A. (2003). The elementary school students as an agent of learning activity. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 41(5), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405410563

Dougherty, B. (2004). Early algebra: perspectives and assumptions. For the Learning of Mathematics, 24(3), 28–30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40248469

Dreyfus, T. (2015). Constructing abstract mathematical knowledge in context. In S. J. Cho, (Ed.). Selected regular lectures from the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 115–133). Springer International Publishing

El'konin, D. (1999). On the structure of learning activity. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 37(6), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405370684

Eriksson, H. (2021). Att utveckla algebraiskt tänkande genom lärandeverksamhet: en undervisningsutvecklande studie i flerspråkiga klasser i grundskolans tidigaste årskurser [Developing algebraic thinking through learning activity. A study of practice developmental teaching in multilingual classes in lower school grades]. [Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University]. urn:nbn:se:su:diva-190408

Eriksson, H., & Eriksson, I. (2020). Learning actions indicating algebraic thinking in multilingual classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics: An International Journal, pp. 1–16. https://doi-org.ezp.sub.su.se/10.1007/s10649-020-10007-y

Eriksson, I., Fred, J., Nordin, A.-K., Nyman, M., & Wettergren, S. (2021). Tasks, tools, and mediated actions – promoting collective theoretical work on algebraic expressions. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 26(3–4), 29–52.

Eriksson, I., & Jansson, A. (2017). Designing algebraic tasks for 7-year-old students – a pilot project inspired by Davydov’s learning activity. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 18(2), 257–272.

Eriksson, I., Wettergren, S., Fred, J., Nordin, A.-K., Nyman, M., & Tambour, T. (2019). Materialisering av algebraiska uttryck i helklassdiskussioner med lärandemodeller som medierande redskap i årskurs 1 och 5 [Materialization of algebraic expressions in whole-class discussions with learning models as mediating tools in Grade 1 and 5]. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 24(3–4), 81–106.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case study. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 301–316). Sage.

Gal'perin, P. (1968). Towards research of the intellectual development of the child. International Journal of Psychology, 3(4), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207596808246649

Gorbov, S. F., & Chudinova, E. V. (2000). Deystviye modelirovaniya v uchebnoy deyatel'nosti shkol'nikov (k postanovke problemy), [The effect of modeling on the students’ learning (Regarding problem formulation)]. Psychological Science and Education, 2, 96–110.

Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebra thinking? In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades. Erlbaum & The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Kieran, C. (2004). The core of algebra: Reflections on its main activities. In K. Stacey, H. Chick, & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra: The 12th ICMI study (pp. 21–34). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Kieran, C. (2018). Introduction. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds: the global evolution of an emerging field of research and practice (pp. ix–xiii). Springer.

Kieran, C., Pang, J., Schifter, D., & Ng, S. F. (2016). Early algebra research into its nature, its learning, its teaching. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32258-2

Krutetskii, V. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. University of Chicago Press.

Larsson, S. (2009). A pluralist view of generalization in qualitative research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 32(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270902759931

Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall.

Linell, P. (1994). Transkription av tal och samtal: teori och praktik [Transcription of speech and dialogues: theory and practice]. Linköping University.

Lins, R., & Kaput, J. (2004). The early development of algebraic reasoning: The current state of the field. In K. Stacey, H. Chick & M. Kendal (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra: The 12th ICMI study (pp. 45–70). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. (Rev. and expanded ed.) Jossey-Bass.

Milligan, L. (2016). Insider-outsider-inbetweener? Researcher positioning, participative methods and cross-cultural educational research, Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(2), 235–250, https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2014.928510

Radford, L. (2006). Algebraic thinking and the generalization of patterns: A semiotic perspective. In S. Alatorre, J. L. Cortina, M. Sáiz & A. Méndez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 2–21). Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, November 9–12. Vol. 1–2.

Radford, L. (2010). Signs, gestures, meanings: Algebraic thinking from a cultural semiotic perspective. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the sixth conference of European research in mathematics education (CERME 6) (pp. XXXIII–LIII). Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France.

Radford, L. (2012). On the development of early algebraic thinking, PNA, 6(4), 117–133.

Radford, L. (2018). The emergence of symbolic algebraic thinking in primary school. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds: The global evolution of an emerging field of research and practice (pp. 3–25). Springer.

Radford, L. (2021). Davydov’s concept of the concept and its dialectical materialist background. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(3), 327-342. doi:10.1007/s10649-020-09959-y

Radford, L., & Barwell, R. (2016). Language in mathematics education research. In A. Gutiérrez, G. Leder, & P. Boero (Eds.), The second handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. The journey continues (pp. 275–313). Sense.

Repkin, V. V. (2003). Developmental teaching and learning activity. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 41(5), https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405410510

Roth, W.-M., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural-historical perspective on mathematics teaching and learning. Sense.

Rubtsov, V. (1991). Learning in children: organization and development of cooperative actions. Nova Science Publishers, Ins.

Rubtsov, V. (2013). The concept of joint activity as a unit of activity theory. Presented ISCAR summer school July 2013.

Schmittau, J. (2003). Cultural-historical theory and mathematics education. In A. Kozulin, B., Gindis, V., Ageyev & S. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context (pp. 225–246). Cambridge University Press.

Schmittau, J. (2004). Vygotskian theory and mathematics education: Resolving the conceptual procedural dichotomy. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173235

Schmittau, J. (2005). The development of algebraic thinking. A Vygotskian perspective. ZDM, 37(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02655893

Schmittau, J., & Morris, A. (2004). The development of algebra in the elementary mathematics curriculum of V. V. Davydov. The Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 60–87.

Sophian, C. (2007). The origins of mathematical knowledge in childhood. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3th ed., pp. 443–466). Sage.

van Oers, B. (2009). Emergent mathematical thinking in the context of play. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9225-x

Venenciano, L., & Dougherty, B. (2014). Addressing priorities for elementary school mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 34(1), 18–24.

Venenciano, L. C., Yagi, S. L., Zenigami, F. K., & Dougherty, B. J. (2020). Supporting the development of early algebraic thinking, an alternative approach to number. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 12(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2019.1614386

Vygotsky, L. S. (1963). Learning and mental development at school age. In B. & J. Simon (Eds.), Educational psychology in the U.S.S.R. Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1934).

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R.W. Rieber & A.S. Carton (Eds.), The conceptions works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). Plenum P.

Warren, E., Trigueros, M., & Ursini, S. (2016). Research on the learning and teaching of algebra In Á. Gutiérrez, G. C. Leder & P. Boero (Eds.), The second handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. The journey continues (pp. 73–108). SensePublishers.

Wettergren, S., Eriksson, I., & Tambour, T. (2021). Yngre elevers uppfattningar av det matematiska i algebraiska uttryck [Younger students’ conceptions of the mathematics in algebraic expressions]. LUMAT, 9(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.1.1377

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage

Zuckerman, G. (2003). The learning activity in the first years of schooling. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (p. 177–199). Cambridge University Press.

Zuckerman, G. (2004). Development of reflection through learning activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(1), 9–18.

Zuckerman, G. (2005). Learning task as a growth point of the search activity. Academia.




How to Cite

Eriksson, I., & Tabachnikova, N. (2022). “Learning models”: Utilising young students’ algebraic thinking about equations. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.10.2.1681



Conceptual understanding and mathematical thinking