Science learning with emotions
Preservice Science teachers as drama facilitators
Keywords:scientific literacy, emotions, drama, solidarity
Drama activities have been argued to engage students’ cognitions, emotions and actions, making them a prospective, although not very well understood part of science education. The aim of this study is to understand pre-service science teachers’ (PSSTs) experiences as drama facilitators for high school science students. The experiences of preservice science teachers’ drama facilitation were explored in two cases, in which they designed and facilitated drama activities for high school students (13-15 years old). The PSSTs in both cases read a story to students, who were then given roles related to that story. The data consists of in-depth interviews with the PSSTs. In the interviews concerning their experiences, the PSSTs were found to to recognize science learning opportunities and challenges while taking care of student inclusion and showing sensitivity towards students’ emotional expressions. The study illustrates a novel framework for working with science learning opportunities and challenges related to emotional expression in drama activities.
Abed, O. H. (2016). Drama-Based Science Teaching and Its Effect on Students’ Understanding of Scientific Concepts and Their Attitudes towards Science Learning. International Education Studies, 9(10), 163–173. https://doi.org/doi:10.5539/ies.v9n10p163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n10p163
Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contri-bution of enajoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contempo-rary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001
Aubusson, P. J., & Fogwill, S. (2006). Role play as analogical modelling in science. Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education, 93–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_8
Barbalet, J. (2011). Emotions Beyond Regulation: Backgrounded Emotions in Science and Trust. Emotion Review, 3(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910380968 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910380968
Bellocchi, A., Quigley, C., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2016). Exploring emotions, aesthetics and wellbeing in science education research (Vol. 13). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43353-0
Bellocchi, A., Ritchie, S. M., Tobin, K., King, D., Sandhu, M., & Henderson, S. (2014). Emotional climate and high quality learning experiences in science teacher education. Journal of Re-search in Science Teaching, 51(10), 1301–1325. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21170
Bellocchi, A., & Turner, J. H. (2019). Conceptualising valences in emotion theories: A sociological approach. In Emotions in late modernity (Vol. 1, pp. 41–55). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351133319-5
Belova, N., Eilks, I., & Feierabend, T. (2015). The evaluation of role-playing in the context of teaching climate change. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9477-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9477-x
Braund, M., Ekron, C., & Moodley, T. (2013). Critical episodes in student teachers’ science lessons using drama in Grades 6 and 7. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1–2), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2013.826966 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2013.826966
Carlsson, B. (2003). Dramatic potosynthesis. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 49(1), 26.
Close, H. G., & Scherr, R. E. (2015). Enacting conceptual metaphor through blending: Learning activities embodying the substance metaphor for energy. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 839–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025307
Çokadar, H., & Yılmaz, G. C. (2010). Teaching ecosystems and matter cycles with creative drama activities. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9181-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9181-3
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton university press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851744
Danckwardt-Lillieström, K., Andrée, M., & Enghag, M. (2018). Creative drama in chemistry edu-cation: A social semiotic approach. NorDiNa: Nordic Studies in Science Education, 14(3), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.5869 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.5869
Danckwardt-Lillieström, K., Andrée, M., & Enghag, M. (2020). The drama of chemistry–supporting student explorations of electronegativity and chemical bonding through creative drama in upper secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 42(11), 1862-1894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1792578
D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., & Graesser, A. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learn-ing. Learning and Instruction, 29, 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.003
Do, S. L., & Schallert, D. L. (2004). Emotions and Classroom Talk: Toward a Model of the Role of Affect in Students’ Experiences of Classroom Discussions. Journal of Educational Psycholo-gy, 96(4), 619. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06188.8.131.529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-06184.108.40.2069
Dorion, K. R. (2009). Science through drama: A multiple case exploration of the characteristics of drama activities used in secondary science lessons. International Journal of Science Educa-tion, 31(16), 2247–2270. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802712699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802712699
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nurs-ing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Lüdtke, O., Pekrun, R., & Sutton, R. E. (2009). Emotional transmission in the classroom: Exploring the relationship between teacher and student enjoyment. Jour-nal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014695
Frijda, N. H. (2010). Impulsive action and motivation. Biological psychology, 84(3), 570-579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.01.005
Fugate, J. M., Macrine, S. L., & Cipriano, C. (2019). The role of embodied cognition for transform-ing learning. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 7(4), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2018.1443856 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2018.1443856
Hannula, M. S. (2020). Affect in mathematics education. In Encyclopedia of mathematics educa-tion (Stephan Lerman, pp. 23–27). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_174
Hareli, S., & Parkinson, B. (2008). What's social about social emotions?. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(2), 131-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00363.x
Herranen, J., & Aksela, M. (2019). Student-question-based inquiry in science education. Studies in Science Education, 55(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1658059 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2019.1658059
Heyward, P. (2010). Emotional Engagement Through Drama: Strategies to Assist Learning Through Role-Play. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 197–204.
Jakobson, B., & Wickman, P.-O. (2008). The roles of aesthetic experience in elementary school science. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9039-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9039-8
Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Megowan-Romanowicz, C., Birchfield, D. A., & Savio-Ramos, C. (2016). Effects of embodied learning and digital platform on the retention of physics content: Cen-tripetal force. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1819. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01819 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01819
Lamminpää, J., & Vesterinen, V.-M. (2018). The use of humour during a collaborative inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 40(14), 1718–1735. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1508926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1508926
Lee, B. K., Patall, E. A., Cawthon, S. W., & Steingut, R. R. (2015). The effect of drama-based ped-agogy on preK–16 outcomes: A meta-analysis of research from 1985 to 2012. Review of Edu-cational Research, 85(1), 3–49. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314540477 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314540477
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED362379
Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development. Emotion Review, 5(2), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912468165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912468165
Ødegaard, M. (2003). Dramatic science. A critical review of drama in science education. Studies in Science Education, 39(1), 75–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260308560196
Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement (Sandra Christenson, Amy Reschly, Cathy Wylie, pp. 259–282). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12
Saricayir, H. (2010). Teaching electrolysis of water through drama. Journal of Baltic Science Edu-cation, 9(3), 179–186.
Scarantino, A., & de Sousa, R. (2018). Emotion. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/emotion/
Sebastian, C., Viding, E., Williams, K. D., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2010). Social brain development and the affective consequences of ostracism in adolescence. Brain and Cognition, 72(1), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.008
Shen, W., Zhao, Y., Hommel, B., Yuan, Y., Zhang, Y., Liu, Z., & Gu, H. (2019). The impact of spontaneous and induced mood states on problem solving and memory. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 32, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.03.002
Sinatra, G. M., Broughton, S. H., & Lombardi, D. (2014). Emotions in science education. In Inter-national handbook of emotions in education (R. Pekrun&L. Linnenbrink-Garcia, pp. 415–436).
Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. In Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (Yehudit Judy Dori, Zemira R. Mevarech, Dale R. Baker, pp. 65–88). Re-trieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_4
Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
Strati, A. D., Schmidt, J. A., & Maier, K. S. (2017). Perceived challenge, teacher support, and teacher obstruction as predictors of student engagement. Journal of Educational Psycholo-gy, 109(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000108
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2009). Transforming “apathy into movement”: The role of prosocial emotions in motivating action for social change. Personality and Social Psy-chology Review, 13(4), 310–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309343290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309343290
Thomas, G. (2010). Doing case study: Abduction not induction, phronesis not theory. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(7), 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410372601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410372601
Tobin, K., Ritchie, S. M., Oakley, J. L., Mergard, V., & Hudson, P. (2013). Relationships between emotional climate and the fluency of classroom interactions. Learning Environments Re-search, 16(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9125-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-013-9125-y
Tyng, C. M., Amin, H. U., Saad, M. N., & Malik, A. S. (2017). The influences of emotion on learn-ing and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454
Varelas, M., Pappas, C. C., Tucker-Raymond, E., Kane, J., Hankes, J., Ortiz, I., & Keblawe-Shamah, N. (2010). Drama activities as ideational resources for primary-grade children in urban science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 302–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20336
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage cop.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Jaakko Turkka, Maija Aksela
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.