Attitudes in mathematical discovery processes:: The case of Alex and Milo

Carolin Danzer

doi:10.31129/LUMAT.12.1.2131

Authors

Carolin Danzer Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4849-5478

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.12.1.2131

Keywords:

students’ attitudes, mathematical discovery process, handling of counterexamples, qualitative research, secondary education

Abstract

This paper’s purpose is to investigate the attitude of students in mathematical discovery processes in terms of the handling of counterexamples. By understanding this attitude as a kind of scientific attitude, it consists of different aspects that become visible in the behaviour during a mathematical discovery process. Since such a process is particularly complex, the author’s interest is to use the concept of attitude as an explanation for students’ behaviour that occurs when dealing with conflicts such as counterexamples. Semi-structured interviews with sixth graders of a German Gymnasium were conducted and analysed in a qualitative and interpretative way. As a result, the case study of Alex and Milo is presented. Based on the framework that observable behaviour is influenced by an underlying attitude, there are drawn conclusions about Alex’s and Milo’s attitudes adopted in the mathematical discovery process and their impact on the process is elaborated.

References

Allport, W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. A. Murchison (Ed.), A handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–844). Clark University Press.

American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for Scientific Literacy. Oxford University Press.

Anderson, L. W. (1980). Assessing Affective & Characteristic in the Schools. Allyn and Bacon.

Bauersfeld, H. (1985). Ergebnisse und Probleme von Mikroanalysen mathematischen Unterrichts. In: W. Dörfler & R. Fischer (Hrsg.): Empirische Untersuchungen zum Lehren und Lernen von Mathematik (pp. 7-25). Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.

Daskalogianni, K., & Simpson, A. (2000). Towards a definition of attitude: The relationship between the affective and the cognitive in pre-university students. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th conference of the IGPME (pp. 217–224). PME.

Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2010). ‘Me and maths’: Towards a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9134-z

Dunbar, K., & Klahr, D. (1989). Developmental Differences in Scientific Discovery Strategies. In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex Information Processing: The Impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 109-143). Erlbaum.

Eisenhart, M. (1988). The ethnographic research tradition and mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19 (2), 99–114.

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis. Verbal reports as data. MIT Press.

Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an Educational Task. Reidel.

Gardner, P. L. (1975). Attitudes to Science: A Review. Studies in Science Education, 2(1), 1–41.

Goldin, G. A. (2002). Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 59-72). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47958-3_4

Haladyna, T., Shaughnessy, J., & Shaughnessy, M. (1983). A causal analysis of attitude toward mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 19–29.

Harlen, W. (1996). Teaching and Learning Primary Science. Paul Chapman Publishing.

Krummheuer, G., & Brandt, B. (2001). Paraphrase und Traduktion: Partizipationstheoretische Elemente einer Interaktionstheorie des Mathematiklernens in der Grundschule. Beltz.

Kuhn, D. (1989). Children and Adults as Intuitive Scientists. Psychological Review, 96(4), 674 - 689.

Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills. Academic Press.

Kulm, G. (1980). Research on mathematics attitude. In R. J. Shumway (Ed.), Research in mathematics education (pp. 356-387). NCTM.

Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805-820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583

Leuders, T., Naccarella, D., & Philipp, K. (2011). Experimentelles Denken – Vorgehensweisen beim innermathematischen Experimentieren. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 32(2), 205–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-011-0027-1

Leuders, T., & Philipp, K. (2013). Preparing students for discovery learning – skills for exploring mathematical patterns. In A. Heinze (Eds). Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the PME, Vol. 3, Kiel, Germany, 241-248.

Liljedahl, P., Oesterle, S., & Bernèche, C. (2010). Beliefs as dynamic: Old light through a new window. In F. Furinghetti & F. Morselli (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Mathematical Views (pp. 8-11). MAVI.

Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical background and procedures. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. C. Presmeg (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education. Advances in Mathematics Education (pp. 365–380). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13

McLeod, D. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575–596). Macmillan.

Meyer, M. (2018). Options of Discovering and Verifying Mathematical Theorems – Task-design from a Philosophic-logical Point of View. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(9), em1588. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92561

Pepin, B., & Roesken-Winter, B. (2015). Introduction. In B. Pepin & B. Roesken-Winter (Eds.), From beliefs to dynamic systems in mathematics education: Exploring a mosaic of relationships and interactions (pp. xv-xviii). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06808-4

Philipp, K. (2013). Experimentelles Denken: Theoretische und empirische Konkretisierung einer mathematischen Kompetenz. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01120-8

Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257-315). Information Age.

Tweney, R. D. (1989). A framework for the cognitive psychology of science. In B. Gholson, A. Houts, R. A. Neimeyer, & W. Shadish (Eds.), Psychology of science: Contributions to metascience (pp. 342–366). Cambridge University Press.

Voigt, J. (1984). Interaktionsmuster und Routinen im Mathematikunterricht: theoretische Grundlagen und mikroethnographische Falluntersuchungen. Beltz.

Walsh, C. (1991). The relationship between attitudes towards specific mathematics topics and achievement in those domains. University of British Columbia.

Winter, H. (2016). Entdeckendes Lernen im Mathematikunterricht. Springer.